» substantial evidence

Protect Niles v. City of Fremont - Personal Observations May Support a CEQA "Fair Argument"

Posted By:
Sean K. Hungerford James I. Anderson
August 2018 A recent unpublished opinion by California’s First Appellate District highlights the risk that CEQA lead agencies face when they approve projects with potential visual or traffic impacts based on a negative declaration. In Protect Niles… Read More
Read More
Categories: Articles, CEQA, Environmental, Land Use, Mitigation
Tags: aesthetics, CEQA, development proposal, EIR, fair argument, lead agency, negative declaration, substantial evidence, traffic impacts